|
The Federal Reserve and the
Treasury issued a final rule to implement the portions of the
Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (“Act”) relating to
payment systems and their participants.
The Act prohibits gambling organizations from accepting payments
in connection with unlawful Internet gambling. Such payments are
termed "restricted transactions." The Act also requires the FED
to prescribe regulations requiring designated payment systems
and their participants to establish policies and procedures
reasonably designed to identify and block restricted
transactions.
The underpinning of the Act requires payment systems such as
card systems and their participants to establish and implement
written policies and procedures reasonably designed to identify
and block restricted transactions concerning credit card, debit
card, pre-paid card, or stored value card.
CARD PROCESSING: The Act includes two non-exclusive
examples whereby policies and/or procedures maybe deployed for
purposes of complying with the rules:
1. Provide for the implementation of a code system, such as
transaction codes and merchant/business category codes, that are
required to accompany the authorization request for a
transaction, including:
a. The operational functionality to enable the card system
operator or the card issuer to reasonably identify and deny
authorization for a transaction that the coding procedure
indicates may be a restricted transaction; and
b. Procedures for ongoing monitoring or testing by the card
system operator to detect potential restricted transactions,
including: (i) conducting testing to determine whether
authorization requests are properly coded; and (ii) monitoring
and analyzing payment patterns to detect suspicious payment
volumes from a merchant.
2. For the card system operator, merchant acquirer, or
third-party processor, include procedures to be followed when
the participant has actual knowledge that a merchant has
received restricted transactions through the card system, such
as:
a. The circumstances under which the access to the card system
for the merchant, merchant acquirer, or third-party processor
should be denied; and
b. The circumstances under which the merchant account should be
closed.
Exemptions: The Act does not exempt from compliance any
designated payment system in its entirety, but rather exempts
certain participants in the ACH, check collection, and wire
transfer systems. With respect to domestic transactions, the Act
exempts all participants in these systems except for a
participant that would have a customer relationship with an
Internet gambling business.
Cross-Border Transactions: The Act places the
responsibility on U.S. payment system participants that send
transactions to, or receive transactions from, foreign
institutions to establish policies and procedures reasonably
designed to prevent these restricted transactions. For example,
a U.S. correspondent bank could require in its account agreement
that foreign institutions have policies and procedures in place
to avoid sending restricted transactions to the U.S.
participant.
Over-blocking: The Act’s over-blocking provisions
stipulate that nothing in the regulation is intended to suggest
that payment systems or their participants must or should block
transactions explicitly excluded from the definition of unlawful
Internet gambling.
Black-List: The Act and/or regulators have opted-out of
creating a black list to identify the names of merchants alleged
in illegal Internet gambling activity.
Intermediaries: The Act does not specifically address how a
payment card system should handle transactions with payment
intermediaries, such as when a card is used to fund an
electronic account (e.g., PayPal) and the account is used to pay
an Internet casino.
Under the Act, financial institutions may rely upon a written
statement and/or notice from their service provider if: (i) it
relies on and complies with the written policies and procedures
of the card system that are reasonably designed to identify and
block restricted transactions (or, in the alternative,
reasonably designed to deny access to the system to Internet
casinos that may submit restricted transactions); and (ii) such
policies and procedures of the system comply with the Act.
Regulators anticipate that the written statement by a service
provider will provide sufficient evidence of compliance. If upon
review, a regulator determines that a service provider policies
and/or procedures are deficient under the Act, the regulator
must work with the service provider to correct any deficiency.
If a service provider is unable and/or unwilling to correct the
deficiency, the regulators and/or service provider would be
required to notify the financial institution that they can no
longer rely upon the service provider policies and procedures
for compliance of the Act.
Compliance Dates: The Act is effective on January 19,
2009; compliance with the Act is not mandatory until December 1,
2009.
|